React and other similar libraries (like Vue.js) are becoming the de facto choice for larger businesses that require complex development where a more simplistic approach (like using a WordPress theme) won’t satisfy the requirements.
Still, some complexities remain, which I’ll run through in this guide.
On that note, here’s what we’ll cover:
The simplest way to understand the components is by thinking of them as plugins, like for WordPress. They allow developers to quickly build a design and add functionality to a page using component libraries like MUI or Tailwind UI.
If you want the full lowdown on why developers love React, start here:
React implements an App Shell Model, meaning the vast majority of content, if not all, will be Client-side Rendered (CSR) by default.
CSR means the HTML primarily contains the React JS library rather than the server sending the entire page’s contents within the initial HTTP response from the server (the HTML source).
If you don’t see many lines of HTML there, the application is likely client-side rendering.
The result is you’ll then see the site has a lot of HTML:
Note the appMountPoint ID on the first <div>. You’ll commonly see an element like that on a single-page application (SPA), so a library like React knows where it should inject HTML. Technology detection tools, e.g., Wappalyzer, are also great at detecting the library.
Ahrefs’ Site Audit saves both the Raw HTML sent from the server and the Rendered HTML in the browser, making it easier to spot whether a site has client-side rendered content.
Even better, you can search both the Raw and Rendered HTML to know what content is specifically being rendered client-side. In the below example, you can see this site is client-side rendering key page content, such as the <h1> tag.
Websites created using React differ from the more traditional approach of leaving the heavy-lifting of rendering content on the server using languages like PHP—called Server-side Rendering (SSR).
Before SSR, developers kept it even simpler.
They would create static HTML documents that didn’t change, host them on a server, and then send them immediately. The server didn’t need to render anything, and the browser often had very little to render.
In practice, SSR and SSG are similar.
The key difference is that rendering happens with SSR when a browser requests a URL versus a framework pre-rendering content at build time with SSG (when developers deploy new code or a web admin changes the site’s content).
SSR can be more dynamic but slower due to additional latency while the server renders the content before sending it to the user’s browser.
SSG is faster, as the content has already been rendered, meaning it can be served to the user immediately (meaning a quicker TTFB).
To understand why React’s default client-side rendering approach causes SEO issues, you first need to know how Google crawls, processes, and indexes pages.
We can summarize the basics of how this works in the below steps:
Historically, issues with React and other JS libraries have been due to Google not handling the rendering step well.
Some examples include:
Thankfully, Google has now resolved most of these issues. Googlebot is now evergreen, meaning it always supports the latest features of Chromium.
In addition, the rendering delay is now five seconds, as announced by Martin Splitt at the Chrome Developer Summit in November 2019:
Last year Tom Greenaway and I were on this stage and telling you, ‘Well, you know, it can take up to a week, we are very sorry for this.’ Forget this, okay? Because the new numbers look a lot better. So we actually went over the numbers and found that, it turns out that at median, the time we spent between crawling and actually having rendered these results is – on median – it’s five seconds!”
This all sounds positive. But is client-side rendering and leaving Googlebot to render content the right strategy?
The answer is most likely still no.
It’s important to note that you can overcome all issues with React and SEO.
React JS is a development tool. React is no different from any other tool within a development stack, whether that’s a WordPress plugin or the CDN you choose. How you configure it will decide whether it detracts or enhances SEO.
Ultimately, React is good for SEO, as it improves user experience. You just need to make sure you consider the following common issues.
The most significant issue you’ll need to tackle with React is how it renders content.
Introducing this unknown builds a good case for opting for a server-side rendered solution to ensure that all crawlers can see the site’s content.
In addition, rendering content on the server has another crucial benefit: load times.
However, after the initial render by the browser, subsequent load times tend to be quicker due to the following:
Depending on the number of pages viewed per visit, this can result in field data being positive overall.
However, if your site has a low number of pages viewed per visit, you’ll struggle to get positive field data for all Core Web Vitals.
The best option is to opt for SSR or SSG mainly due to:
Implementing SSR within React is possible via ReactDOMServer. However, I recommend using a React framework called Next.js and using its SSG and SSR options. You can also implement CSR with Next.js, but the framework nudges users toward SSR/SSG due to speed.
Next.js supports what it calls “Automatic Static Optimization.” In practice, this means you can have some pages on a site that use SSR (such as an account page) and other pages using SSG (such as your blog).
The result: SSG and fast TTFB for non-dynamic pages, and SSR as a backup rendering strategy for dynamic content.
You may have heard about React Hydration with ReactDOM.hydrate(). This is where content is delivered via SSG/SSR and then turns into a client-side rendered application during the initial render. This may be the obvious choice for dynamic applications in the future rather than SSR. However, hydration currently works by loading the entire React library and then attaching event handlers to HTML that will change. React then keeps HTML between the browser and server in sync. Currently, I can’t recommend this approach because it still has negative implications for web vitals like TTI for the initial render. Partial Hydration may resolve this in the future by only hydrating critical parts of the page (like ones within the browser viewport) rather than the entire page; until then, SSR/SSG is the better option.
Since we’re talking about speed, I’ll be doing you a disservice by not mentioning other ways Next.js optimizes the critical rendering path for React applications with features like:
Speed and positive Core Web Vitals are a ranking factor, albeit a minor one. Next.js features make it easier to create great web experiences that will give you a competitive advantage.
Many developers deploy their Next.js web applications using Vercel (the creators of Next.js), which has a global edge network of servers; this results in fast load times.
Vercel provides data on the Core Web Vitals of all sites deployed on the platform, but you can also get detailed web vital data for each URL using Ahrefs’ Site Audit.
Simply add an API key within the crawl settings of your projects.
After you’ve run your audit, have a look at the performance area. There, Ahrefs’ Site Audit will show you charts displaying data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) and Lighthouse.
A common issue with most SPAs is they don’t correctly report status codes. This is as the server isn’t loading the page—the browser is. You’ll commonly see issues with:
You can see below I ran a test on a React site with httpstatus.io. This page should obviously be a 404 but, instead, returns a 200 status code. This is called a soft 404.
The risk here is that Google may decide to index that page (depending on its content). Google could then serve this to users, or it’ll be used when evaluating a site.
In addition, reporting 404s helps SEOs audit a site. If you accidentally internally link to a 404 page and it’s returning a 200 status code, quickly spotting the area with an auditing tool may become much more challenging.
There are a couple of ways to solve this issue. If you’re client-side rendering:
If you’re using SSR, Next.js makes this simple with response helpers, which let you set whatever status code you want, including 3xx redirects or a 4xx status code. The approach I outlined using React Router can also be put into practice while using Next.js. However, if you’re using Next.js, you’re likely also implementing SSR/SSG.
This issue isn’t as common for React, but it’s essential to avoid hash URLs like the following:
Generally, Google isn’t going to see anything after the hash. All of these pages will be seen as https://reactspa.com/.
SPAs with client-side routing should implement the History API to change pages.
A common mistake with SPAs is using a <div> or a <button> to change the URL. This isn’t an issue with React itself, but how the library is used.
Doing this presents an issue with search engines. As mentioned earlier, when Google processes a URL, it looks for additional URLs to crawl within <a href> elements.
If the <a href> element is missing, Google won’t crawl the URLs and pass PageRank.
The solution is to include <a href> links to URLs that you want Google to discover.
Checking whether you’re linking to a URL correctly is easy. Inspect the element that internally links and check the HTML to ensure you’ve included <a href> links.
As in the above example, you may have an issue if they aren’t.
However, it’s essential to understand that missing <a href> links aren’t always an issue. One benefit of CSR is that when content is helpful to users but not search engines, you can change the content client-side and not include the <a href> link.
In the above example, the site uses faceted navigation that links to potentially millions of combinations of filters that aren’t useful for a search engine to crawl or index.
Loading these filters client-side makes sense here, as the site will conserve crawl budget by not adding <a href> links for Google to crawl.
It’s common for sites developed with React to inject content into the DOM when a user clicks or hovers over an element—simply because the library makes that easy to do.
This isn’t inherently bad, but content added to the DOM this way will not be seen by search engines. If the content injected includes important textual content or internal links, this may negatively impact:
Here’s an example on a React JS site I recently audited. Here, I’ll show a well-known e‑commerce brand with important internal links within its faceted navigation.
However, a modal showing the navigation on mobile was injected into the DOM when you clicked a “Filter” button. Watch the second <!—-> within the HTML below to see this in practice:
Spotting these issues isn’t easy. And as far as I know, no tool will directly tell you about them.
Instead, you should check for common elements such as:
You’ll then need to inspect the element on them and watch what happens with the HTML as you open/close them by clicking or hovering (as I have done in the above GIF).
While there are additional SEO considerations with React applications, that doesn’t mean other fundamentals don’t apply.
You’ll still need to make sure your React applications follow best practices for:
Unfortunately, working with React applications does add to the already long list of issues a technical SEO needs to check. But thanks to frameworks like Next.js, it makes the work of an SEO much more straightforward than what it was historically.
Hopefully, this guide has helped you better understand the additional considerations you need to make as an SEO when working with React applications.
Source: ahrefs.com, originally published on 2022-03-01 01:00:14